Terminator Dark Fate Didnt Need an Exploding Airplane
The latest Terminator movie, Dark Fate, struggles to give satisfying emotional arcs to its large cast of characters. Writer Sara Lynn Michener says it doesnât help that a large chunk of the movie is wasted on a bombastic action sequence set aboard an exploding cargo plane.
âI think thereâs this idea with, especially, male directors where they get really excited about trying to top whatâs been done before, but do it even bigger and better and more Michael Bay-ish,â Michener says in Episode 386 of the Geekâs Guide to the Galaxy podcast. âAnd Iâm like, really? Are we really doing that in 2019? Itâs very upsetting.â
Podcast
Geekâs Guide to the Galaxy host David Barr Kirtley agrees that the cargo plane sequence was silly, and stands in sharp contrast to the sense of realism captured in the franchiseâs best installments, The Terminator and Terminator 2: Judgment Day.
âTo my mind, the power of those movies comes from the juxtaposition of these creepy robots from the future set against this completely believable everyday reality,â he says. âAnd when you make it evil robots from the future in sort of a superhero milieu, it just doesnât work. Thereâs no contrast anymore.â
Over-the-top action scenes arenât just eye-rolling, theyâre also expensive. Screenwriter Rafael Jordan warns that needlessly bloated budgets are placing unrealistic expectations on sci-fi movies. âThe last three [Terminator] installments all made around $400 million, and based on first weekend grosses this is right in line with that,â he says. âThere have been a whole series of filmsâ"the recent Star Trek films, Alita, Tron: Legacyâ"that make $400 million and are deemed failures, and this is just going to be another one of those. Hollywood has to figure out a way to make $400 million a viable amount of money again.â
Dark Fate represents Hollywoodâs third attempt to continue the story of Terminator 2, after the 2003 film Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines and the 2008 TV series The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Science fiction author Anthony Ha says that the scaled-down TV version arguably surpasses its big budget rivals in terms of storytelling.
âObviously a lot of IP is moving to TV,â he says. âSo if [Terminator] were to come backâ"and Iâm not necessarily convinced it willâ"I think it might come back as a TV show.â
Listen to the complete interview with Sara Lynn Michener, Rafael Jordan, and Anthony Ha in Episode 386 of Geekâs Guide to the Galaxy (above). And check out some highlights from the discussion below.
Sara Lynn Michener on James Cameron:
âJames Cameron has this really charming idea of feminism, and his only real issue with that is that he hasnât really updated it since the â90s. I mean, when I saw Alita: Battle Angel, it felt like a wonderful movie that came out in 1995â"other than the effects. ⦠But he has this strong female obsession thing, and I think that unfortunately thereâs sort of this strong female thing where it ends up being this commercialized âMegan Fox happens to know how to repair motorcyclesâ thing, and itâs always this super-sexualized idea of a strong woman, and James Cameronâs women were not really that. And so that resonated with me very strongly. I loved The Abyss, I loved Aliens, I loved the Terminator movies. So it was a very formative part of my upbringing.â
Rafael Jordan on screenwriting:
âIn general what happens is you wait and wait to get a job, and then the minute youâre hired itâs an extreme rush. Thereâs never enough time, and thatâs the unfortunate thing, because the minute they call you theyâre like, âHey, so weâre finally greenlit, and we need the script immediately to secure the bond and the financing, so can you give it to us in a week?â And youâre like, âWhat? No. I mean, I can give you something in a week, but are you going to guarantee Iâve got time to fix it and make it right?â And sometimes you get that time, sometimes you donât. ⦠But trust me, these writers are pulling their hair out, and sometimes theyâre sequestering themselves in hotel rooms for six to eight weeks if they get that luxury. But theyâre definitely trying to make it better, itâs just such an uphill battle for quality, always.â
Anthony Ha on the Rev-9:
âMy sense is that none of the sequelsâ"including Dark Fateâ"has found a way to top the T-1000. I feel like that was pretty close to the Platonic ideal of a Terminator villain. But this is an interesting variation, and the visuals I think are very striking, and it definitely makes for some interesting action scenes, because youâve essentially got two different Terminators with one brain going after [people]. I wish theyâd done a little bit more to explore the powers of the Rev-9. ⦠Like if [the two forms] had complementary powers, so the soft version is really good at insinuating himself into different situations, but the skeleton is there for brute strength. Something that makes it seem more distinctive.â
David Barr Kirtley on Arnold Schwarzenegger:
âThe movie kind of lost me when they meet Arnold Schwarzenegger. I love Arnold Schwarzenegger, heâs great, but I already saw him as the good Terminator in three other movies. Itâs been done, I hate the corny humor, and I felt like once he enters the story, it becomes much too focused on him rather than developing the relationships between the other characters. ⦠When I saw the trailers, that Arnold Schwarzenegger was going to be in this, I assumed it was going to be a cameoâ"that they go to the cabin, and they meet Arnold Schwarzenegger, and he tells them whatever he tells them, and then they move on. I didnât think he was going to join the cast. And I think probably anything positive about his inclusion in this movie probably could have been incorporated into a cameo.â
More Great WIRED Stories
0 Response to "Terminator Dark Fate Didnt Need an Exploding Airplane"
Post a Comment